Showing posts with label Visual Analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Visual Analysis. Show all posts

Tuesday, 14 October 2014

Seminar 1: Visual Analysis Exercise



Bottle and The Dog Who Was a Cat Inside both came out in the 2000s, albeit quite a few years apart, respectively in 2010 and 2002. Bottle was created by CALarts student Kirsten Lepore from Los Angeles, California, while The Dog Who was a Cat Inside was done by Siri Melchior, a danish animator from Copenhagen, Denmark. And so Bottle is the more recent of the two animations.

Bottle focuses on the long distance relationship between two fairly different creatures (With one composed of warm sand while the other of snow), and by not actually having the chance to meet with one another until the very end, the little gifts they would receive from the other perhaps hints at their belief to alter their appearances to satisfy the other’s expectations for when the time came for them to see one another.

The title for Siri Melchior’s piece, with the usage of the word “was” (Instead of “had”, which would imply something else altogether) already suggests that the message behind its story is the identity issues the main character/s faces, and that it is in fact just one individual that suffer from split personality, or even transgender issues.

While not actually dark in terms of its storytelling, Bottle does give off a far more somber tone as compared to The Dog Who Was a Cat Inside, with its lack of music and its rather sad (But still considerably open) ending. One would assume that the two perished upon entering the sea, hence never getting the chance to meet with one another, while it could also be assumed that the two simply became a part of the sea and hence were finally able to join together as one, discarding their physical forms whilst doing so.

Comparing to Bottle’s ending then, The Dog Who Was a Cat Inside clearly had the happier ending, as the character/s was/were able to find a kindred spirit in the end and accept themselves for what they are (Allowing both personas to get along with one another). And as mentioned earlier, it has an overall more light-hearted and humorous tone of storytelling compared Bottle, with its more colourful and cartoony style and whimsical soundtrack (Which is most definitely an aspect that makes a huge difference to any animation, film, video game, etc.).

Both shorts do seem to focus on the subject matter of identity, though on considerably different levels and areas of it, Bottle seems to focus on identity through peer pressure while The Dog Who Was a Cat Inside focuses on a more different psychological aspect of it. Regardless, both animations were perhaps made to be more open to interpretation, so that they would be more presentable to a wider audience. This especially applies to The Dog Who Was a Cat Inside, if it truly had been focusing on a considerably sensitive subject such as the acceptance of transgender; it had to be made in a way that it is not too obvious or offensive for its audience.

While both animated shorts can be enjoyed by a wide audience, The Dog Who Was a Cat Inside will perhaps be better enjoyed for its cute and quirky presentation and overall more light-hearted tone of storytelling.

Friday, 18 October 2013

Visual Analysis - Dusan Vukotic's "Surogat (Ersatz)" and Jiri Trnka's "The Hand"











Surogat (Also known as Ersatz or The Substitute) and Ruka (The Hand) both came out in the 60s (In 1965 and 1961 respectively) and were both produced by European studios. However it is the similarities that stop right there as both animations have very different messages that they had wished to show to their viewers, as well as how it was presented to them.

To start off, both already differ from one another in terms of animation technique and art style. Surogat was a cel-shaded animation with a stylishly simplistic and far more fun cartoony art style as compared to Ruka; all characters and props were drawn as very basic geometric shapes and were flatly colored save for the painted backgrounds that were textured in a nice contrast of attractive vibrancy.

Ruka on the other hand uses stop motion puppets, while the animation does have some rather intricately pretty details such as the puppet’s clothing and its quaint little home; it is easily overshadowed by the overall gloomy setting and lighting used throughout. The puppet that is used for the main character is incredibly heart breaking to look at in all its fragility (With its large, sad eyes), even when it was still being happy and contented with its life and before things had taken a really bad turn.

While both animations do not actually contain any proper form of dialogue, Surogat used far more entertaining and exaggerated sound effects to not only bring out the animation’s humorous tone, but to also further enhance actions and situations that are about to take place as well. Ruka limited its sound effects, going more for the usage of dramatic music, giving the overall animation short a dark, suffocating and depressingly spiraling sort of ambience as the story progresses.

As mentioned in a previous post, Ruka is a protest against communism, the hand, being the antagonist, symbolizing the repressive regime of the communist government, ever intent on taking complete control over the lives of those it rules over. And the puppet, symbolizing those very lives, a society suffering under the hand's control and struggling with all its might to break free.

Surogat’s balloon world (Complete with squeaky balloon sounds) setting already implies of the artificiality of the life the obnoxious main character was living, and despite how fun and how in control of it (Well most of the time) he was of it all, none of it was truly real, possibly symbolizing the beliefs of a society of people at the time who refused to see the truth of a harsh reality before their eyes, only seeing what they desired with rose-colored glasses, eventually though, the denial would consume them.

Again both presentations were done differently for the animation shorts, Ruka was actually straight to the point in its grim message, with no humor whatsoever with no pity at all given to its character as it never had a chance of winning. Surogat, despite it also having a meaningful message of its own, was presented in a far more entertaining and light hearted manner for the enjoyment of the viewers.

When you consider all of that, aside for some mildly adult (If not really clever visual gags) content seen throughout the short, I find that Surogat can be enjoyed by a larger audience as compared to Ruka, that was clearly aimed at a more adult audience for its serious message and complete lack of humor.

Both videos can be viewed at the provided links below: